Considering the occurrence of an earthquake, the bearing capacity of a strip footing placed on a saturated cohesive-frictional soil mass has been computed by performing a pseudo-static rigorous analysis incorporating the existence of (i) excess pore water pressures, and (ii) additional seismic-tractions and body forces. The analysis has been carried out by using lower and upper bounds finite elements limit analysis (FELA) in conjunction with the second order cone programming (SOCP) using the Mohr-Coulomb (MC) yield criterion. The generation of the excess pore water pressure in the event of an earthquake has been incorporated by defining a pore pressure coefficient ru-a ratio of the excess pore water pressure to the total vertical overburden stress at any point. The analysis has revealed that the bearing capacity reduces considerably with an increase in the magnitude of horizontal earthquake acceleration. For a given magnitude of earthquake acceleration, the bearing capacity reduces extensively further with an increase in the value of ru. All the computational results have been presented in a non-dimensional manner, and for the validation purpose, necessary comparisons have also been made. The study will be useful for designing foundations in a seismically active zone.

The presence of underground structures within fault zones has the potential to alter deformation patterns on the ground surface, thereby placing existing structures-typically regarded as safe-at risk. This paper presents findings from four centrifuge model tests and 3D numerical simulations exploring the effects of tunneling in fault zones. This study investigated the values associated with foundation rotation, surface deformations, and the patterns of fault rupture propagation through various soil strata. The results demonstrate that the presence of a tunnel alters the interaction pattern between fault rupture and foundation systems, which can lead to an increase in foundation rotation. Notably, the findings indicate that a precise consideration of superstructure shape can enhance foundation rotation by up to 23%. Furthermore, the presence of a tunnel in the fault zone causes substructures to endure major damage from vertical fault displacements exceeding 0.6 m. In contrast, these substructures experienced similar levels of damage at vertical fault displacements of 1.7 m in the absence of tunnels.

This study presents experimental results from scale model tests on laterally loaded bridge pile foundations in soils subjected to seasonal freezing. A refined finite-element model (FEM) was established and calibrated based on data obtained from the experiments. Furthermore, the model was utilized to investigate the impact of soil scouring depth on the lateral behavior of bridge pile foundations embedded in seasonally frozen soils. The findings indicate that soil freezing significantly enhances the lateral bearing capacity of the pile-soil interaction (PSI) system while reducing lateral deflection of the pile foundation. However, soil freezing results in increased damage to the pile foundation and upward movement of the plastic zone toward the ground surface. Under unfrozen conditions, significant plastic deformations occur on the ground surface and even inside the piles due to the extrusion effect. Additionally, increasing soil scouring depth significantly reduces the lateral bearing capacity of the PSI system while also increasing lateral deflection of the pile foundation for a given load level. Notably, when the scouring depth exceeds 2 m in unfrozen soils, the entire pile experiences obvious deformation and inclination, exhibiting a short-pile behavior that negatively affects the lateral stability of the pile under lateral loads.

This study investigates the application of machine learning (ML) algorithms for seismic damage classification of bridges supported by helical pile foundations in cohesive soils. While ML techniques have shown strong potential in seismic risk modeling, most prior research has focused on regression tasks or damage classification of overall bridge systems. The unique seismic behavior of foundation elements, particularly helical piles, remains unexplored. In this study, numerical data derived from finite element simulations are used to classify damage states for three key metrics: piers' drift, piles' ductility factor, and piles' settlement ratio. Several ML algorithms, including CatBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, and traditional classifiers, are evaluated under original, oversampled, and undersampled datasets. Results show that CatBoost and LightGBM outperform other methods in accuracy and robustness, particularly under imbalanced data conditions. Oversampling improves classification for specific targets but introduces overfitting risks in others, while undersampling generally degrades model performance. This work addresses a significant gap in bridge risk assessment by combining advanced ML methods with a specialized foundation type, contributing to improved post-earthquake damage evaluation and infrastructure resilience.

This study presents the design and structural analysis of a bridge to protect two natural gas pipelines against static and dynamic loads resulting from a new railway line to be constructed above them. Structural analyses were conducted considering earthquake effects, particularly using the load combinations and coefficients recommended by AASHTO LRFD [2017]. The railway bridge is not designed to span any crossings. However, since the existing railroad is situated directly on the ground, a train load is transferred to the pipelines through the ground. To reduce this load transfer, a 25-30cm gap is maintained between the deck and the ground in this protective bridge design proposal. The maximum anticipated displacement of the bridge was considered in the analysis. Site-Specific Earthquake Hazard Analysis was first performed for the proposed bridge due to the critical implications of the pipelines. In the second stage, the structure underwent nonlinear dynamic displacement loading and bridge-pile-soil interaction was analyzed using both linear and nonlinear methods. The performance targets - Uninterrupted Use for DD2a class ground motion and Controlled Damage for DD1 earthquake) - stipulated by the Turkish Bridge Design Standards [TBDS, 2020] were evaluated using strength-based linear and strain-based nonlinear analyses. The results confirmed that the proposed bridge satisfied all target safety levels. In conclusion, this study aims to guide both designers and practitioners, as it is among the first to address the newly enacted TBDS-2020 regulation in Turkiye and serves as an exemplary engineering solution for similar protective bridge designs.

The pressuremeter test is a widely used in-situ test method in geotechnical engineering for determining ground properties. It is applicable to all types of soil and weak rocks, it records soil deformation under loading conditions. This paper presents a literature review on the application of the pressuremeter test in evaluating the behavior of foundations under load. It explores the methods used to interpret pressuremeter test data in various soil types, reviews the different analytical models employed, and focuses on approaches for assessing the behavior of foundations using pressuremeter test results. The achievements and limitations of each method are presented and discussed. Despite the extensive literature on the applications, interpretation, and development of the pressuremeter test, its use in evaluating the behavior of foundations under load remains limited. This work seeks to address this research gap by identifying challenges in utilizing pressuremeter test data for such analyses and providing recommendations for future research. This work aims to encourage further investigation into the potential of pressuremeter tests for advancing the understanding of foundation behavior under loading conditions.

This paper employs three-dimensional parallel finite elements to assess the seismic response and resilience of various pile group configurations. The numerical model was verified in the literature through two large-scale shaking table tests. A parametric study was conducted to depict the influences of pile number (N), position within a pile group, pile nonlinearity, and frequency content on the seismic response in sloping liquefiable soils. The result showed that the importance of these factors on the analysis and design for the pile groups, while they are not considered in the current design codes including Japan Road Association (JRA) 2002 and American Petroleum Institute (API). Furthermore, the API method most likely underestimates P-y at shallow depths rather than numerical analysis results, while it overestimates at deeper burial depths. In addition, JRA code overestimates the monotonic soil pressure in the infinite pile group and underestimates it in the finite pile group. In other words, the difference between the computed soil pressure from JRA and the numerical model decreases with N. The asymmetry ratio (AR) is also important for the acceleration response, since AR decreases with N. Also, it has been shown that the seismic responses increase in corner piles with the N due to the increasing stiffness. Subsidence at the downslope side of the pile group and heave at the upslope side of the one occurs and increases with N. Nonlinear pile behavior increases maximum displacements, especially in central piles, while reducing internal forces in corner piles. Corner and side piles yield earlier, requiring middle piles to sustain greater forces under continued lateral spreading.

This study explores the transverse response of bridge piers in riverbeds under a multi-hazard scenario, involving seismic actions and scoured foundations. The combined impact of scour on foundations' stability and on the dynamic stiffness of soil-foundation systems makes bridges more susceptible to earthquake damage. While previous research has extensively investigated this issue for bridges founded on piles, this work addresses the less explored but critical scenario of bridges on shallow foundations, typical of existing bridges. A comprehensive soil-foundation structure model is developed to be representative of the transverse response of multi-span and continuous girder bridges, and the effects of different scour scenarios and foundation embedment on the dynamic stiffness of the soil-foundation sub-systems are investigated through refined finite element models. Then, a parametric investigation is conducted to assess the effects of scour on the dynamic properties of the systems and, for some representative bridge prototypes, the seismic response at scoured and non-scoured conditions are compared considering real earthquakes. The research results demonstrate the significance of scour effects on the dynamic properties of the soil-foundation structure system and on the displacement demand of the bridge decks.

The overconsolidation ratio considerably affects the physical and mechanical properties of soil as well as the interaction between structures and soil. Scale and consolidation time limitations render the preparation of overconsolidated soil for small-scale model tests difficult. Therefore, studying structure-soil interactions, especially the vertical bearing capacity of pile foundations in overconsolidated soil becomes challenging. Given the importance of reliable overconsolidated soil in physical model tests for studying soil-structure interactions, this study, based on the fundamental of the overconsolidation ratio, established a reliable method for preparing overconsolidated soil by altering centrifuge acceleration. Piezocone penetration tests were conducted to validate the accuracy of this method. Furthermore, vertical bearing capacity of pile foundations was evaluated in various overconsolidated soils. The vertical ultimate bearing capacity of pile foundations, cone penetration resistance, pore water pressure, and sleeve friction resistance were obtained in soils with various overconsolidation ratios. Based on the results of both tests, a formula was developed to calculate the vertical ultimate bearing capacity of pile foundations, taking into account the overconsolidation ratio of soil. This proposed method for evaluating vertical bearing capacity of pile foundations in overconsolidated soil can also be applied to study interactions between other marine structures and soil. The results of the study can provide technical support for designing the foundations of offshore oil and gas facilities, wind power, and other structures.

This article presents the authors' experience with large-scale shaking table tests conducted in Japan using the E-Defense shaking table. The discussion focuses on four criticisms often addressed regarding the utilities of large-scale shaking table tests. Potential solutions to mitigate such criticisms are discussed based on shaking table tests conducted for a pair of three-story wooden houses. The first criticism is that the test specimen anchored rigidly to a rigid shaking table is not a reproduction of actual structures supported by soils and foundations. A model ground was developed in a large sandbox, which occupied about 85% of the total specimen weight, supported the house, and the entire soil-structure system was shaken. Considerable sliding occurred, having lessened the earthquake forces exerted and resultant damage to the superstructure. The second criticism is that a single specimen test, regardless of its size, cannot provide sufficient information for generalizing the behavior and performance. Empirical equations between the maximum story drift and the change in the natural frequency were developed from a series of shaking table tests. Using such empirical equations might promote quick damage assessment of individual houses when suffering from actual earthquakes. The third criticism is the importance of public appeal and eventual support from the general public to secure the budget to operate large-scale testing facilities. The example test featured two nearly identical specimens placed on the table with different support conditions. The apparent difference in response revealed the effect of support conditions on seismic performance. The fourth criticism is the importance of increasing the number of experimental projects to balance the operation budget. Most of the preparation in the example test was accomplished in an open yard adjacent to the shaking table, and the test specimens were quickly assembled on the table using indoor cranes. The table occupation was four out of 35 weeks of the entire test duration.