Understanding the carbohydrate dynamics of sprouting Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. and Sonchus arvensis L. ramets can assist in optimizing perennial weed management. However, detailed knowledge about general reserve dynamics, minimum values in reserves (compensation point) and different reserve determination methods remains sparse. We present novel insights into reserve dynamics, which are especially lacking for S. arvensis. We uniquely compare root weight changes as a proxy for carbohydrates with direct carbohydrate concentration measurements using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). In a greenhouse study, ramets of two sizes (20 and 10 cm) were planted in pots. Subsequent creeping roots of sprouted plants were destructively harvested and analyzed for carbohydrates 12 times between planting and flowering. Efficiency in storing carbohydrates and the replenishing rate of root weight and carbohydrates was much higher in S. arvensis than in C. arvense. Thus, our study urges to evaluate perennial weed species individually when investigating root reserves. Determining root reserves by either using root weight changes as a proxy for carbohydrates or directly measuring carbohydrate concentrations by HPLC differed in the minimum values of reserves referred to as compensation points. For both species, these minimum values occurred earlier based on root weight than based on carbohydrate concentrations. Cutting ramets into 20 or 10 cm sizes did not significantly affect carbohydrate concentration or root weight changes for both species. We conclude that any practical applications targeting perennial weeds by fragmenting roots into small ramets through belowground mechanical control must be evaluated for trade-offs in soil structure, soil erosion, and energy consumption.

Weed control in medicinal and aromatic plants (MAP) is particularly challenging as many species have a low competitiveness at early growth stages. Intra-row (within the row) mechanical weed control is most challenging since crops may be damaged as well. Here we compared five different devices for mechanical intra-row weeding (finger, torsion and rotative weeders, tine harrow, ridger share) in lemon balm and parsley, focusing on the critical stage of crop establishment. In total, eight field trials were carried out in 2020 and 2021 at two experimental farms of the University Bonn in the west of Germany. The devices were tested in replicated trials after optimising the settings on test plots. Data on weed control efficacy (WCE) and crop damage were analysed with ANOVA. The average WCE was 66 % and had a high variability ranging from 0 % to 100 %. Tine harrows could be applied most often and at earlier growth stages, followed by finger weeder. Highest crop damage was noted after use of rotative weeder. Yield decreasing effects were only significant in two cases and tended to be lower in transplanted than in sown lemon balm and parsley. However, due to variable operating conditions a consistent ranking of weeding devices was not possible. We conclude that despite significant technical progress during the last two decades, a complete replacement of herbicides is difficult at present, unless weed control is carried out manually. Further research is needed to ascertain under which environmental and management conditions mechanical intra-row weeding is most effective in the field, and how these techniques can be best integrated with other weed control methods.

Interrow weed control is used in a wide range of crops, traditionally applied via physical cultivation or banded herbicide application. However, these methods may result in crop damage, development of herbicide resistance, or off-target environmental impacts. Electric interrow weed control presents an alternative, although its potential impact on crop yield requires further investigation. One of the modes of action of electric weed control is the continuous electrode-plant contact method, which passes a current through the weed and into the roots. As the current passes into the roots, it can potentially disperse through the soil to neighboring root systems. Such off-target current dispersion, particularly in moist topsoil with low resistance, poses potential concern for neighboring crops when electric interrow weed control is applied. This research evaluated the continuous electrode-plant contact method, using a Zasso (TM) XPower machine, in comparison with mowing across three trials conducted in 2022 and 2023. Both treatments were used to remove target lupine (Lupinus albus L.) plants adjacent to a row of non-target lupine. Electric weed control was applied to plants in dry soil or following a simulated rainfall event. The trials demonstrated that electric weed control and mowing did not reduce density and biomass of neighboring non-target lupine plants compared with the untreated control. Likewise, pod and seed production, grain size, and protein, as well as grain germinability and vigor of the resulting seedlings, were not reduced by these weed control tactics. This research used technology that was not fit for purpose in broadscale grain crops but concludes that electric weed control via the continuous electrode-plant contact method or mowing did not result in crop damage. Therefore, it is unlikely that damage will occur using commercial-grade electric weed control or mowing technology designed for large-acreage interrow weed control, thus offering nonchemical weed management options.

Fast regrowth from deep roots and rhizomes makes it difficult to mechanically control the perennials Cirsium arvense and Tussilago farfara respectively. It is, however, not clear whether new shoots originate mainly from fragments of roots/rhizomes in upper soil layers or from an intact system below depth of soil cultivation. Here we present results from three experiments with natural infestations of C. arvense, and two with both C. arvense and T. farfara. Plots of 1 m(2) were excavated to different depths (13-25 cm), all below-ground plant parts in the topsoil were collected and thereafter fragments were either returned to or removed from the plots. Regrowth from disturbed plots with removed or returned fragments was compared. The origin of regrown shoots, that is, whether they originated from seeds, intact below-ground root/rhizome systems or returned fragments, was examined. More C. arvense shoots originated from the intact root system (48%-84%) than from root fragments (16%-52%). The final aboveground biomass was not affected by removal of the top-soil fragments. For T. farfara, a small proportion (3%) of new shoots originated from the intact rhizome system, and the rest from fragments. We conclude that the intact root system of C. arvense contributes at least as much as root fragments to regrowth after soil cultivation, which might imply that time of treatment and depth of cultivation are crucial for the effect of mechanical control. For T. farfara, the results suggest that tillage equipment with high capacity to fragment the rhizome system will contribute to efficient control.

Bioherbicides might be used to manage weeds as opposed to synthetic chemical herbicides, reducing environmental risks and advancing sustainable agriculture in the meantime. Bioherbicides employ different mechanisms of action to control weeds. Microbial bioherbicides may infect and damage weed plants, disrupt their growth, or produce compounds inhibiting weed development. Plant-derived bioherbicides often target specific biochemical processes crucial for weed survival. It can be applied through conventional spraying equipment, seed treatments, or soil incorporation. Bioherbicide development faces several challenges. One major hurdle is the complex diversity of weed species across different regions, requiring tailored bioherbicide solutions. The regulatory approvals for bioherbicides can be lengthy and costly, hindering widespread adoption. Scaling up production processes and ensuring product stability also pose challenges. By reducing reliance on chemical herbicides, bioherbicides can mitigate environmental pollution, protect non-target organisms, and promote sustainable agricultural practices. The development of locally adapted bioherbicides and strategic collaborations between researchers, industries, and policymakers could further enhance their prospects in a particular country. In addition, the knowledge gaps need to be addressed prior to adopting bioherbicides in agriculture. These review intended to explore the existing state of knowledge about the categories of bioherbicides, their formulation procedure, application approaches and mode of action to control weed. The bioherbicides that are currently on the market, their effects on weed physiology, and possible factors affecting their efficacy are all included in this review. Moreover, this review offers a perspective on existing challenges and future opportunities for adopting the bioherbicides in sustainable and eco-friendly agriculture.

The success of weed control is critical for our food security. Non-chemical weed control is a promising technique in sustainable agriculture to ensure the food security. In this review, multiple directed energy weed control methods are reviewed with a specific focus on laser and optical radiation weed control. The mechanisms of the weed control in terms of adverse ablation, radiation thermal effects, and molecular-level damages are systematically reviewed. In particular, the underlying mathematical models determining the dose and response relationship of the weed control are also analyzed for a rigorous study of the physical law of the control process. Challenges of applying the techniques into practice are also illustrated to guide practical weed control applications.

The goal of the current study was to create and assess the effectiveness of a hand-pulled ergonomically designed flame weeder. The developed weeder was tested in the field at three operating pressures (20, 30 and 40 Psi) and forward speeds (1.00, 1.25 and 1.50 km/h) to study their effects on plant damage, survival rates, weight preservation rates, weed management effectiveness, soil temperatures, and gas and energy consumption. Thereafter, at optimized values of forward speed and operating pressure, a comparative assessment of flame weeding with traditional methods (mechanical and manual weeding) was done in terms of weed control effectiveness, operational time, energy consumption, and cost of operation. Results showed that the optimal performance of the designed flame weeder was achieved when operated at a speed of 1 km/h and an operating pressure of 40 psi. The survival rate, weight preservation rate, weed control efficiency, change in soil temperature, recovery rate, plant damage, gas consumption, and energy consumption were observed to be 27.3 %, 32.5 %, 91.1 %, 40.74 degrees C, 8.5 %, 2.2 %, 4.05 kg/h, and 2500.24 MJ/ha, respectively, at optimized values of forward speed (1.00 km/h) and operating pressure (40 Psi). The actual field capacity, field efficiency and operating cost of the flame weeder were 0.0755 ha/h, 94.94 %, and 3620.81 (sic)/ha, respectively. Hand weeding had the best level of weed control effectiveness, but it was a laborious, time-consuming process. When compared to manual weeding, flame weeding was 50.42 % cheaper and 94.82 % faster.

White lupine (Lupinus albus L.) is a well-known green manure crop in Hungary, but the production of seeds can be badly impacted by weeds. The sweet white lupine 'Nelly' was grown on acidic sandy soil, and experimental plots were treated with different herbicides. Flumioxazin (0.06 kg ha(-1)), pendimethalin (5 L ha(-1)), dimethenamid-P (1.4 L ha(-1)), pethoxamid (2 L ha(-1)), clomazone (0.2 L ha(-1)), metobromuron (3 L ha(-1)), and metribuzin (0.55 L ha(-1)) were applied pre-emergence (1-2 days after sowing). Imazamox was also tested and applied post-emergence (1 L ha(-1)) when some basal leaves were clearly distinct (BBCH 2.3). In this paper, the weed control efficiency and the phytotoxicity of herbicides applied to lupine are examined. Vegetation index datasets were collected 12 times using a manual device and 2 times using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The phytotoxicity caused by herbicides was visually assessed on several occasions throughout the breeding season. The frequency of weed occurrence per treatment was assessed. The harvested seed yields, in kg ha(-1), were analyzed after the seeds were cleaned. The herbicides metribuzin and imazamox caused extensive damage to white lupine. While pendimethalin, dimethenamid-P, pethoxamid, and clomazone were outstanding in several measured indicators, the final ranking which summarizes all the variables showed that only the pethoxamid and clomazone treatments performed better than the control. Metribuzin and imazamox were highly phytotoxic to white lupine. In the future, it would be appropriate to integrate more post-emergence active substances into trials, and the pre-emergence herbicides involved in this study should be further tested.

In the Mediterranean area, vineyard soils are often characterized by a high stone content. In these contexts, where tools commonly adopted for under-row weed control are frequently damaged, the utilization of a chain mower could be a preferable alternative. This research aims to compare a modified mower with chains with other tools commonly employed that control weeds through tillage, such as motorized discs, blade weeder, and rotary star hoe. Weed control effectiveness, effects on weed flora composition, soil compaction, and operative efficiencies were evaluated. The chain mower allowed us to obtain encouraging results of weed biomass reduction (55.4 and 25.4%, between and around vine trunks, respectively), weed height reduction (35.9%), and weed cover reduction (79.2%), comparable to the other tools. All the tools showed a lower weed control efficacy around vine trunks rather than between them (weed biomass reductions of 24.8% and 52.6%, respectively). Results regarding the effect on weed flora composition seem to confirm this trend. Despite the higher chain mower field time (3.78 h ha-1) and fuel consumption (24.24 kg ha-1) compared to the blade weeder and the rotary star hoe, its versatility in stony soil and its lower impact on soil (soil penetration resistances of 1602.42 and 2262.83 kPa in 2022 and 2023, respectively) compared to the other tools make it a potentially advantageous implement for under-row weed management in vineyards. Further studies could be useful to improve chain mower performance, particularly around vine trunks, by evaluating in different planting layouts different dimensions of both the cutting element and feeler, which allows the vine-skipping mechanism.