Underground structures may be buried in liquefiable sites, which can cause complex seismic response mechanisms depending on the extent and location of the liquefiable soil layer. This study investigates the seismic response of multi-story underground structures in sites with varying distributions of liquified soil employing an advanced three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model. The results indicate that the extent and location of liquefied soil layers affect the seismic response characteristics of underground structures and the distribution of their damage. When the lower story of the subway station is buried in liquefied interlayer site, the structure experiences the most serious damage. When the structure is located within a liquefiable interlayer site, the earthquake ground motion will induce greater inter-story deformation in the structure, resulting in larger structural residual displacement. When all or part of the underground structure is buried in the liquefiable soil layer, the structural failure mode should be assessed to ensure that the underground rail transit can quickly restore functionality after an earthquake. Meanwhile, permeability effects of liquefiable soil have a significant impact on the dynamic response of subway station in the liquefiable site.

Shallow cut-and-cover underground structures, such as subway stations, are traditionally designed as rigid boxes (moment-resisting connections between the main structural members), seeking internal hyperstaticity and high lateral (transverse) stiffness to achieve important seismic capacity. However, since seismic ground motions impose racking drifts, this proved rather prejudicial, with great structural damage and little resilience. Therefore, two previous papers proposed an opposite strategy seeking low lateral (transverse) stiffness by connecting the structural elements flexibly (hinging and sliding). Under severe seismic inputs, these structures would accommodate racking without significant damage; this behaviour is highly resilient. The seismic resilience of this solution was numerically demonstrated in the well-known Daikai station (Kobe, Japan) and a station located in Chengdu (China). This paper is a continuation of these studies; it aims to extend, deepen, and ground this conclusion by performing a numerical parametric study on these two stations in a wide and representative set of situations characterised by the soil type, overburden depth, engineering bedrock position, and high- and lowlateral-stiffness of the stations. The performance indices are the racking displacement and the structural damage (quantified through concrete damage variables). The findings of this study validate the previous remarks and provide new insights.

Seismic risk assessment of code-noncompliant reinforced concrete (RC) frames faces significant challenges due to structural heterogeneity and the complex interplay of site-specific hazard conditions. This study aims to introduce a novel framework that integrates three key concepts specifically targeting these challenges. Central to the methodology are fragility fuses, which employ a triplet of curves-lower bound, median, and upper bound-to rigorously quantify within-class variability in seismic performance, offering a more nuanced representation of code-noncompliant building behavior compared to conventional single-curve approaches. Complementing this, spectrum-consistent transformations dynamically adjust fragility curves to account for regional spectral shapes and soil categories, ensuring site-specific accuracy by reconciling hazard intensity with local geotechnical conditions. Further enhancing precision, the framework adopts a nonlinear hazard model that captures the curvature of hazard curves in log-log space, overcoming the oversimplifications of linear approximations and significantly improving risk estimates for rare, high-intensity events. Applied to four RC frame typologies (2-5 stories) with diverse geometries and material properties, the framework demonstrates a 15-40 % reduction in risk estimation errors through nonlinear hazard modeling, while spectrum-consistent adjustments show up to 30 % variability in exceedance probabilities across soil classes. Fragility fuses further highlight the impact of structural heterogeneity, with older, non-ductile frames exhibiting 25 % wider confidence intervals in performance. Finally, risk maps are presented for the four frame typologies, making use of non-linear hazard curves and spectrumconsistent fragility fuses accounting for both local effects and within-typology variability.

Previous studies have demonstrated that reducing earthquake-induced damage to central columns in underground structures can effectively prevent the collapse of overall structures. Truncated columns (TC) are less likely to experience severe damage during lateral deformation because the partial release of the constraints at both ends of the columns helps maintain their integrity. This approach can effectively enhance the seismic performance of the overall underground structures. In this study, pushover and shaking table tests were conducted to investigate the seismic performance of a subway station using TC columns compared to that using the cast-in-place columns (CC). These tests aimed to examine failure modes, structural stiffness, lateral deformation and load-bearing capacities, acceleration and deformation responses of the underground structures. The results from the pushover tests indicated that the initial stiffness of both structures-those with TC and with CC-was equivalent. On the other hand, the shaking table tests showed no significant differences in the dynamic responses of the two types of underground structures under small earthquakes. However, the vertical ground motions exacerbated damage to the structures. Although the lateral load-bearing capacity of the structure with TC is somewhat lower, the movements between the column ends and beams during loading enhance the structure's ability to adapt to the deformation of surrounding soil due to the release of column end constraints. As a result, the seismic resistance of the overall underground structures is improved. It is important to note that the ceiling slab and sidewalls in the structures with TC are more likely to crack during earthquakes, thus requiring additional efforts to prevent leakage. The findings of this study provide experimental evidence that supports the seismic control of underground structures.

The seismic resilience of underground structures is one of the critical issues for the development of resilient cities. However, existing assessing methods for assessing the seismic resilience of underground structures do not comprehensively address their seismic capacity and post-earthquake recoverability. This paper developed a seismic resilience index and framework for assessing the seismic resilience of underground frame structures by considering both the damage and functionality of underground structures caused by earthquakes, as well as the processes involved in repairs. The seismic resilience index was developed by quantifying the resist resilience and recovery resilience, which can be used to describe the robustness, redundancy, and resourcefulness of the seismic resilience. Then the assessing procedure for this method is presented step by step. Additionally, a case study was conducted to assess the seismic resilience of a frame subway station, focusing on the economic losses associated with earthquakes. The study also discusses the improvements in seismic resilience achieved through the use of reinforced concrete truncated (RCT) columns. Results indicate that RCT columns can significantly enhance the seismic resilience of underground structures. The reasonability and quantifiability of the developed method were compared with existing methods, demonstrating its effectiveness. Furthermore, the developed assessing method can be extended to assess the seismic resilience of underground structures after quantifying their operational functionality.

Geosynthetics are widely used in civil engineering reinforcements owing to their high strength, acceptable toughness, and ease of transportation. However, traditional geosynthetics do not have the capability to monitor damage inside the soil. Therefore, in this paper, a new sensor-enabled piezoelectric geobelt (SPGB) is developed to measure the deformation of reinforced-soil structures. In-soil drawing tests are conducted to investigate the sensing performance of the SPGB. Variations in the voltage and impedance signals of the SPGB with the drawing displacement under different damage conditions are investigated. The results show that with the increase of drawing displacement, SPGB undergoes tensile deformation followed by pullout damage. In tensile deformation, the signal response of SPGB is related to strain. As the strain increases, the output voltage first increases and then decreases, and the impedance gradually decreases. In the pullout damage phase, the signal response of SPGB is related to the contact area between SPGB and soil. As the drawing displacement increases, the contact area between SPGB and soil gradually decreases, the output voltage gradually decreases, and the impedance gradually increases. Therefore, the SPGB, as a sensor- enabled geosynthetic, provides a reinforcing function to the soil body and simultaneously performs in-soil catastrophe identification.

Increasing numbers of complex structures are being constructed with the acceleration of urbanization. The complex dynamic characteristics pose challenges to the seismic design of large chassis. This paper investigates the seismic response and damage evolution of complex structures using linear and nonlinear dynamic explicit analysis under obliquely incident SV waves. A twodimensional finite element model considering soil-structure interaction (SSI) is developed using fiber beam elements. Elastic and elastoplastic damage constitutive models are employed. A comprehensive numerical analysis is conducted to investigate the influence of key parameters, including incidence angles, ground motion characteristics, and site types, on the seismic response and damage evolution of complex structures. The results of this study indicate that, in the elastic stage, the seismic response of the frame-shear wall structure is reduced in the case of oblique incidence compared to vertical incidence. Specifically, the inter-story drift ratio is reduced by 60% at an incidence angle of 30 degrees. In comparison to vertical incidence, the inter-story drift ratio and horizontal acceleration of the underground structure are reduced under oblique incidence. Conversely, in the elastic stage, the beam-end vertical displacement ratio and vertical acceleration exhibit increases of 57% and 36%, respectively. In the elastoplastic stage, as the incidence angle increases, the damage to the beams of the underground structure becomes more significant, while the damage to the frame-shear wall structure relatively decreases. Low-frequency ground motion and soft soil amplify the structural response compared to high-frequency and hard soil.

This article evaluates the long-term wet-dry durability of lime, fly ash, and lime-fly ash slurry injection stabilization of expansive soil in the desiccated state. To achieve this objective, the expansive soil was compacted in large cylindrical test moulds and desiccated after making a central hole for slurry injection. Subsequently, the lime slurry/ fly ash slurry/ lime-fly ash slurry, prepared with the predetermined water-binder ratio, was injected into the desiccated expansive soil and cured for 28 days. The test results of lime and lime-fly ash slurry injected soils showed that there is improvement during the first wetting. However, at the end of four wet-dry cycles, the volumetric deformations of lime- and lime-fly ash slurry-treated soils increased to 10.6% and 13.6%, respectively, which are much lower than the volumetric deformation of untreated soil (30.7%). Additional analyses were also conducted to trace the growth of desiccation cracks of both untreated and treated soils. At the end of the third drying cycle, the total percentage of the cracks (surface cracks + annular gap) in lime slurry- and lime-fly ash slurry-treated soils reduced to 1.18% and 5.37% from the untreated soil value of 31.9%. The findings of the present study underline the positive impact of using lime, and lime in conjunction with fly ash for controlling the volume change behaviour of expansive soils. Furthermore, combination of lime and fly ash significantly reduces the consumption of lime, leading to sustainability in geotechnical practices.

The restraining effect of soilbags inhibits soil dilatancy, enhancing the strength and stiffness of the wrapped soil. As a permanent slope protection structure (SSPS), the application of counterpressure enhances stability by improving slope surface stiffness and limiting deformation. While reinforced slopes have been extensively studied, mechanistic investigations into the stability and failure processes of SSPS remain limited. This study numerically investigated the macro-meso mechanisms of SSPS instability using the discrete element method. Macroscopically, rainfall infiltration increases water absorption, resulting in longitudinal settlement, deformation, and eventual instability. With a friction coefficient of 0.5, the lower soilbags resist sliding forces until the front soilbags are damaged. Inadequate sufficient friction causes the front soilbags to be displaced outward, leading to structural collapse as the lower soilbags bear the additional load. Microscopically, geosynthetic wrapping restrains soil dilatancy, promoting tighter particle arrangements and secondary reinforcement through soilbag expansion. During instability, primary contact forces concentrate on longitudinal settlement, vertical back pressure, and downslope sliding, with force chain evolution revealing slip band formation. Soilbags facilitate coordinated particle deformation and stress distribution, transitioning from anisotropic to isotropic states as instability progresses. These findings enhance the understanding of SSPS instability mechanisms, providing guidance for more reliable design and construction practices.

Silt soil is widely distributed in coastal, river, and lacustrine sedimentary zones, characterized by high water content, low bearing capacity, high compressibility, and low permeability, representing a typical bulk solid waste. Studies have shown that cement and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) can significantly enhance the strength and durability of stabilized silt. However, potential variations due to groundwater fluctuations, long-term loading, or environmental erosion require further validation. This study comprehensively evaluates cement-slag composite stabilized silt as a sustainable subgrade material through integrated laboratory and field investigations. Laboratory tests analyzed unconfined compressive strength (UCS), seawater erosion resistance, and drying shrinkage characteristics. Field validation involved constructing a test with embedded sensors to monitor dynamic responses under 50% overloaded truck traffic (simulating 16-33 months of service) and environmental variations. Results indicate that slag incorporation markedly improved the material's anti-shrinkage performance and short-term erosion resistance. Under coupled heavy traffic loads and natural temperature-humidity fluctuations, the material exhibited standard-compliant dynamic responses, with no observed global damage to the pavement structure or surface fatigue damage under equivalent 16-33-month loading. The research confirms the long-term stability of cement-slag stabilized silt as a subgrade material under complex environmental conditions.