Assessment of seismic deformations of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) walls in literature has dealt with unsolved challenges, encompassing time-consuming analyses, lack of probabilistic-based analyses, ignored inherent uncertainties of seismic loadings and limited investigated scenarios of these structures, especially for tall walls. Hence, a novel multiple analysis method has been proposed, founded on over 257,400 machine learning simulations (trained with 1582 finite element method analyses) and numerous performance-based fragility curves, to promptly evaluate the seismic vulnerability. The conducted probabilistic parametric study revealed that simultaneously considering several intensity measures for fragility curves is inevitable, preventing engineering judgement bias (up to 52% discrepancies in damage possibilities). Up to 75% contrasts between failure possibilities of 8 and 20 m walls, especially under earthquakes with common intensities (e.g. PGA <= 0.3g), raised serious concerns in the application of height-independent designing methods of GRS walls (e.g. AASHTO Simplified Method). Decreases in deformation possibilities were nearly the same due to increasing reinforcement stiffness (J) (1000 to 2000 kN/m) and reinforcement length to wall height ratio (L/H) (0.8 to 1.5); a decisive superiority of J variations over increasing L/H, as a remedial plan. The proposed methodology privileges engineers to swiftly assess the seismic deformations of multiple GRS walls at the design stage.

In the present study, the centrifuge modeling approach was utilized to investigate the efficacy of dual-functional hybrid geosynthetics as reinforcement in alleviating the destabilizing effects of rainfall on geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls (GRSWs) with low-permeable backfill. A series of centrifuge experiments were executed employing a tailored in-flight rainfall simulation mechanism, generating mistlike fine droplets at 40g on a rigid-facing GRSW with a height of 10 m and provided with a low-permeable silty sand backfill. To comprehensively assess the performance, pore water pressures were continuously monitored using pore pressure transducers. Digital image analysis (DIA) was employed to evaluate surface settlements, wall face movements, and strains encountered by geosynthetic layers during rainfall. The centrifuge test results indicated that GRSW without any drainage provisions developed substantial pore water pressures and experienced a catastrophic slip failure within a brief period of rainfall exposure. Providing a granular drainage layer behind the facing in isolation was noticed to be futile with a GRSW failure in 16.85 days, coupling the drainage layer with hybrid geosynthetic reinforcements with high transmissivity characteristics showcased exceptional hydraulic and deformation characteristics and demonstrated remarkable resilience even under the influence of an imposed surcharge load. Consequently, rigorous seepage and stability analyses were performed, yielding outcomes in consonance with the observations from the centrifuge experiments. The integration of hybrid GRSW with the drainage layer behind the facing experienced considerably low pore water pressures and high safety factors, even following exposure to a 30-day antecedent rainfall.

This paper presents a case study on instrumenting, monitoring, and finite element modeling (FEM) of geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The GRPS-MSE wall was monitored using various instruments such as piezometers, earth pressure cells, shape-acceleration arrays (SAAs), and strain gauges. The performance criteria included efficacy, stress concentration ratio (SCR), differential settlement, and reinforcement tension. Collected data, such as excess pore-water pressures, contact pressures on pile and soft soil, differential settlements, and lateral displacement of MSE wall, were analyzed thoroughly. A 3D FEM was also developed to simulate the GRPS MSE wall, and the results are in good agreement with field data. The results demonstrated significant load transfer from soil to piles as a result of soil arching, yielding 30-32 SCR. The field efficacy was measured at 37.69 %, while the FEM efficacy was estimated as 42.4. Strains in geogrids within the geosynthetic-reinforced load transfer platform (GLTP) system were under 1%, less than the 5% maximum recommended by FHWA. The maximum differential settlement measured between pile cap and soft soil from SAAs is 7.1 mm, while it is estimated to be 8.3 mm from FEM. The MSE wall exhibited low lateral displacement (<25 mm), indicating enhanced stability because of GLTP. The comparison between five analytical GLTP design methods showed that the CUR226 methods gave the closest results to field measurements and FEM results. This study offers crucial insights into leveraging GLTP and MSE walls in highway construction.

The technology of geosynthetic mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls can help solve classical geotechnical earth retaining wall problems. It can also contribute to achieving the new required performance for infrastructures, such as reliance and sustainability. To further develop this technology, it is essential to analyze the history of its progress. This study summarizes the state-of-the-art research on the mechanical and soil interaction properties of geosynthetics, physical modeling and in situ measurements, analytical and numerical modeling, and reliability analyses by reviewing approximately 728 papers published in well-known international journals in this field and some notable conference paper contributions during the period of approximately 50 years from 1972 to 2023. The latest analytical methods, such as risk-based life cycle cost and CO2 emission assessments and damage/failure predictions, are introduced to evaluate the resilience and sustainability performance of geosynthetic MSE walls. Finally, the prospects of a seismic isolation technique with new types of geosynthetics and life cycle management using a long-term sensor for geosynthetic MSE walls are discussed.