Thermal conduction control is important for retarding permafrost degradation and mitigating of frost geohazards. Similar to a thermodiode, high thermal conductivity contrast (HTCC) materials can serve as good thermal insulators. A preferred HTCC material for ground cooling is larger in thermal resistance in summer and smaller in winter. Because of contrasting thermal conductivity under frozen and thawed states, organic soil is blessed with such a property. This study quantified and reported the HTCC effects on a range of soil organic matter concentrations (SOMC) and soil moisture saturation degree (SMSD). Using the COMSOL, influences of different SOMC and SMSD on ground temperatures were simulated and compared with laboratory-measured properties. Simulation results demonstrated that with constant SMSD at 20% throughout the year, the thermal insulation effect was strengthened with increasing SOMC. A better insulating effect was judged by lower annual amplitudes and smaller depths of zero annual amplitude of ground temperatures. In case of low SMSD in summer (20%) and high SMSD in winter (60-80%), the HTCC effect of soil is enhanced with increasing SOMC. This enhancement was evidenced by increased thermal offsets and decreased maximum summer and average nearsurface soil temperatures. With constant SOMC and increasing SMSD, the rising HTCC effect gradually cools the ground. An integral analysis indicates that the higher the SOMC and SMSD in winter, the larger the thermal offset and the lower the ground temperature, i.e., the greater the HTCC effect of organic soil. This study may provide geocryological bases for engineering and environmental applications in cold regions.

Existing carbon offset protocols for improved cookstoves do not require emissions testing. They are based only on estimated reductions in the use of non-renewable biomass generated by a given stove, and use simplistic calculations to convert those fuel savings to imputed emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2). Yet recent research has shown that different cookstoves vary tremendously in their combustion quality, and thus in their emissions profiles of both CO2 and other products of incomplete combustion. Given the high global warming potential of some of these non-CO2 emissions, offset protocols that do not account for combustion quality may thus not be assigning either appropriate absolute or relative climate values to different technologies. We use statistical resampling of recent emissions studies to estimate the actual radiative forcing impacts of traditional and improved cookstoves. We compare the carbon offsets generated by protocols in the four carbon markets that currently accept cookstove offsets (Clean Development Mechanism, American Carbon Registry, Verified Carbon Standard, and Gold Standard) to a theoretical protocol that also accounts for emissions of carbonaceous aerosols and carbon monoxide, using appropriate statistical techniques to estimate emissions factor distributions from the literature. We show that current protocols underestimate the climate value of many improved cookstoves and fail to distinguish between (i.e., assign equal offset values to) technologies with very different climate impacts. We find that a comprehensive carbon accounting standard would generate significantly higher offsets for some improved cookstove classes than those generated by current protocols, and would create much larger separation between different cookstove classes. Finally, we provide compelling evidence for the inclusion of renewable biomass into current protocols, and propose guidelines for the statistics needed in future emissions tests in order to accurately estimate the climate impact (and thus offsets generated by) cookstoves and other household energy technologies.