This paper presents experimental and theoretical research aimed at deepening the understanding of the lateral response of monopiles in sand subjected to cyclic loading. A series of 1-g model tests were performed for varying cyclic load and magnitude ratios, as well as for different pile stiffnesses. The broadly phenomenological behaviors of the monopile including accumulated displacement, cyclic secant stiffness, bending moment and reloading responses were captured. The results reveal the effects of cyclic load ratio, amplitude ratio and pile stiffness on the development of accumulated displacement and secant stiffness, and point out the action mechanism that the cyclic bending moment of rigid piles tends to increase while that of flexible piles tends to decrease. The elastic threshold of the reloading curve gradually increases with cycling, and increases with the increment of cyclic magnitude ratio. Crucially, a generalized model capable of describing the hysteretic characteristics of loading curves of monopiles was established, and the computational formulas for predicting the peak accumulated and residual displacements were derived. The reasonableness of the proposed method was verified under different loading parameters and pile-soil systems, which could be used for the preliminary design of offshore monopiles.

Damping plays an important role in the design of offshore wind turbine structures. The hysteretic damping of the seabed soil represents the energy dissipation caused by the soil-particle interaction and the nonlinear behavior of the soil under cyclic loading. However, the effect of sand damping on the lateral response of the monopile foundation of an offshore wind turbine is still unclear. In this paper, the effect of soil hysteretic damping on the lateral dynamic response of a monopile foundation in a sandy seabed is investigated using a subplastic soil constitutive model. The constitutive model response at the foundation level is verified by comparing the monotonic and cyclic responses of the monopile with the results of the 1g model test. The results show that when soil hysteretic damping is present in the monopile-soil system, the energy dissipation in the soil reduces the stress accumulation in the soil, resulting in a reduction in the bending moment and horizontal displacement of the monopile, compared with the case without soil hysteretic damping. The results are crucial for optimizing the monolithic design of offshore wind turbine structures.

Microbiologically Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP) technology offers a promising method for stiffness reinforcement of offshore wind turbines (OWTs). However, edge scour around microbial reinforcement raises concerns about potential stiffness degradation. This study examines the effects of edge scour on the lateral responses of rigid piles reinforced with precast microbial reinforcement using a low-pH one-phase grouting method. Results from static tests, validated by numerical simulations, demonstrated that MICP technology bonded loose sand grains with the pile, forming a bio-reinforced pile with a larger diameter in the shallow soil layer, which significantly enhanced the original pile's bearing capacity and stiffness. However, edge scour reduced the embedment depth of the bio-reinforced pile, leading to a decrease in its bearing capacity and stiffness. Geometrically, protection width was found to have a relatively greater influence on stiffness and capacity compared to protection thickness. Additionally, symmetric cyclic loading tests were conducted to evaluate the effects of edge scour on backbone curves, secant stiffness, and damping ratio. Although MICP-based reinforcement notably enhanced both the secant stiffness and damping ratio of the piles, its effectiveness was completely lost once the scour depth reached the reinforcement thickness of the bio-reinforced soil block.

Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) provides an environmentally friendly solution for reinforcing large diameter monopiles for offshore wind turbines (OWTs). This study presents an investigation into the lateral responses of monopiles with precast microbial reinforcement using a low-pH one-phase method. Both static and cyclic loading tests were carried out. The results of static loading tests show that the failure mode of the bio-reinforced monopile was an overall overturn failure. The lateral bearing capacity was increased by 50% and the bending moment was reduced by about 25% with the bio-reinforcement. Further investigation was conducted on the secant stiffness, damping ratio, and accumulated deformation of the bio-reinforced monopile under various cyclic loadings. With the bio-reinforcement, the accumulated deformation under one-way cyclic loading can be reduced by 30%-60%. The influences of cyclic loading parameters and loading sequence on pile stiffness were clarified. The growth ratio of pile stiffness due to bio-reinforcement under one-way loading was between 1.65 and 2.82, and decreased with increasing load amplitude. The ratio was smaller under two-way loading. Three competing factors on pile stiffness were identified: cyclic compaction of the unreinforced sandy soil, weakening of the bio-reinforced soil and soil subsidence around the bio-reinforced soil.

Precast prestressed high-strength concrete (PHC) pipe pile with cement-improved soil is a novel pile foundation technique that has been extensively utilized in contemporary years due to the enhanced lateral load-bearing capacity in soft grounds. However, though several studies have shown the damage mechanism of single piles with cement-improved soil, the group behavior of such pile foundations is still largely unexplored. Hence, this article aims to illustrate the lateral capacity and tension-induced failure characteristics of single and 1 x 2 group PHC piles reinforced by cement-improved soil. Extensive 3D nonlinear finite element analyses have been performed and the precision of the numerical models is confirmed by a previous experimental-numerical study. The effects of pile spacing, embedment length, and cement-improved soil thickness were examined in terms of various lateral responses and damages. Results have revealed that the addition and thickening of CIS around core piles enhances the overall pile performance and protects the core pile from excessive tensile damage. Declines in head displacement and bending moment were found to be up to 45 % and 25 % for single piles, and up to 47 % and 24 % for group piles, respectively. Moreover, the presence of CIS makes the stress distribution mechanism between the trailing and leading piles in group arrangement more uniform. Results of this study are expected to provide valuable insights for a better understanding of the damage behavior of group precast piles reinforced with cement-improved soil.