As a long lifeline system of buried structures, the utility tunnel (UT) is vulnerable to earthquake invasion. For utility tunnels with inverted siphon arrangements crossing rivers, the seismic response is more complex due to the basin effect of acceleration in the topography and the influence of fluctuating hydrodynamic pressure, but there is currently a gap in targeted seismic response analyses and references. Based on a UT project in Haikou, this paper studied seismic responses of a cast-in-place UT considering the coupled model of water-soil-tunnel structure on ABAQUS software. Herein, the dynamic fluctuation of hydrodynamic pressure is simulated using an acoustic-solid interaction model. A viscoelastic artificial boundary was used to simulate the soil boundary effect, and seismic loads were equivalent to nodal forces. Considering seismic invading direction and varying water elevation, this paper investigates the dynamic response characteristics and damage mechanisms of river-crossing utility tunnels. This study shows that the basin effect causes the soil acceleration around the UT to show variability in different sections, and the amplification factor of the peak acceleration at the central location is almost doubled. The damage and dynamic water pressure of the UT are intensified under bidirectional seismic excitation, and the damage location is concentrated at the junction of the horizontal and the vertical section. Bending moments and axial forces are the main mechanical behaviors along the axial direction. Changes in river levels have a certain positive effect on the UT peak MISES, DAMAGEC, and SDEG, and it exhibits a certain degree of energy dissipation and seismic damping effect. For the aseismic design of cross-river cast-in-place utility tunnels, bidirectional seismic calculations should be performed, and the influence of river hydrodynamic pressure should not be neglected.

Immersed tunnels, as a form of underwater transportation engineering offering numerous advantages, have been widely deployed in coastal and riverside cities. However, due to the shallow burial and underwater characteristics, immersed tunnels present significantly different surrounding soil and water environments compared to land-based tunnels. Currently, there is limited research on the seismic analysis of submarine immersed tunnels, raising questions about the direct application of the methods of land-based tunnels. In this study, the Davidenkov soil constitutive model is introduced to simulate the strong nonlinearity of deep sedimentary soil in marine areas. The Coupled Acoustic-Structure (CAS) method is employed to simulate the dynamic interaction between seawater and seabed. A time-history analysis model is developed to capture the coupling interactions between seawater, seabed, and tunnel structure. The effects of the soil-tunnel contact mode and seismic input method on the seismic responses of immersed tunnels are investigated in detail. Seismic response characteristics of immersed tunnels are analyzed from four perspectives: distribution of tensile damage in the tunnel, maximum inter-story drift ratio, maximum bending moment, and tunnel inclination angle in the cross-sectional direction. The results indicate that the overlying seawater and sand compaction piles negatively impact the seismic performance of immersed tunnels in the scenarios of this study. Furthermore, their impact pattern and extent are closely correlated with the intensity of the input seismic motion.

Sea-crossing bridges face complex site environments compared to onshore bridges, with the marine environment significantly influencing seismic responses. Despite this, current seismic design for these bridges relies on onshore earthquake records. Therefore, investigating the impact of seawater layers and site conditions on seacrossing bridge seismic performance is crucial. This paper investigates the influence of characteristics of offshore ground motion, site conditions, and hydrodynamic effect on the seismic performance of piers. Initially, based on the validated finite element model, 5 offshore and onshore strong ground motion records from K-NET were selected for assessing the seismic performance of piers. Subsequently, the effects of the water depth and site conditions on the seismic responses of piers were investigated. Finally, the effects of the size, shape, and boundary conditions on the piers were investigated. The result shows that the seismic response of piers under offshore ground motion exceeds that under onshore ground motion. In addition, the seismic response of the pier increases with greater water depth, while they exhibit a slight decrease with increasing soil depth. Notably, the larger the size, result in higher the hydrodynamic pressure, and square piers experience greater hydrodynamic pressure compared to circular piers.