Conventionally, drainage boundaries are often assumed to be either perfectly permeable or completely impermeable. However, a more realistic approach considers continuous drainage boundaries. In this context, an analytical solution for double drainage consolidation in vertical drains is derived. The proposed method is evaluated against existing solutions and finite element simulations. The study investigates the impact of drainage capacity, soil nonlinearity, smear effect, and well resistance. The results show that the continuous drainage boundary parameters (i.e., b and c) significantly affect the distribution of excess pore water pressure and the consolidation rate. Increasing b and c allows realistic modeling of drainage capacity variations from impermeable to permeable boundaries. Notably, when b not equal c, the maximum excess pore water pressure plane shifts from the mid-height of the foundation soil, diverging from conventional consolidation theory. Soil nonlinearity (Cc/Ck) and boundary permeability (b and c) jointly affect consolidation. Higher Cc/Ck values correlate with more detrimental consolidation effects. Minimizing disturbance around vertical drains during construction is crucial due to well resistance and smear zone effects, which can significantly slow down consolidation. This study provides an analytical solution considering soil nonlinearity for predicting consolidation in actual engineering scenarios involving vertical drainage trenches.
This research addresses the characteristics of soft soil subgrades treated by soilbags filled with excavated clayey soil. We evaluated of the strength and deformation modulus of soilbags containing excavated soil using unconfined compression tests. In addition, the drainage consolidation characteristics of soilbag-treated subgrades were investigated via model consolidation tests. Furthermore, a practical application included the construction of a 100 m-long rural road subgrade with these soilbags. The field test and numerical simulation results included the surface settlement and pore water pressure during and after construction to validate the effectiveness of the soilbag treatment for soft soil subgrade. The results show that the soilbags significantly enhanced both the strength and deformation modulus of the soft soil, which met the design requirements after the soilbag treatment. The drainage attributes of the soilbag treatment were also found to support the consolidation process of the soft soil subgrade effectively. Notably, the pore water pressure diminished rapidly during the construction interval, which is beneficial to reducing the post-construction settlement. The settlement uniformity of the subgrade is good verification of the superiority of the soilbag-treated subgrades.