This study evaluated the strength and durability characteristics of pond ash (PA) treated with geopolymer (3%, 6%, 9%, 12%, and 15%, by dry weight of PA) and compared them with Portland cement and hydrated lime stabilizations at same additive contents. Unconfined compressive strength of specimens was evaluated at curing durations of 1, 3, 7, 28, and 90 days. The durability of 28-day cured stabilised specimens against wet-dry cycles, freeze-thaw cycles, water slaking cycles, water immersion, capillary action, and dispersion was assessed. Geopolymer-stabilized PA achieved higher strength and durability than cement and lime-stabilised PA. It is due to the formation of a dense microstructure with significant reaction products. PA stabilised with 3% geopolymer and 15% cement satisfies the strength properties of the cementitious subbase in flexible pavements. Whereas, 6% geopolymer content fulfils the requirements of the cementitious base in flexible pavements and the cementitious subbase in rigid pavements as per IRC: 37-2018 and IRC: 59-2015, respectively.

Chemical stabilisation enhances strength and reduces the swell characteristic of expansive soils, and cement, lime and fly ash (FA) have been used as stabilisers. Currently, there is a scarcity of studies addressing the mix optimisation of expansive soil stabilised with cement, lime, and FA, considering factors such as strength, swell characteristics, cost, and emissions. Thus, the objective of this research is to develop an optimal mix for stabilising expansive soil using cement, lime, and FA, based on these parameters. The samples were stabilised with 2%-12% cement, 1%-6% lime and 5%-30% FA, and testing including unconfined compressive strength (UCS), swell pressure and California bearing ratio (CBR) were conducted. Utility analysis was undertaken by using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) incorporating UCS, cost/UCS, swell pressure, swell percent, and emissions as key parameters. The findings revealed that UCS of the cement stabilised samples increases with the cement content, while the optimum lime and FA contents based on UCS were 3% and 15% respectively. The swell pressure values of cement, lime and FA stabilised soils reduced by 11.6%-35.9%, 11.6%-22.8% and 45.0%-65.6%, respectively. Overall utility analysis revealed that 15% FA stabilised mix is the optimum mix in terms of strength, swell, cost, and emission.

The unconfined compressive strength and shear strength represent the basic mechanical properties of clayey soil. If the soil in its natural state does not have sufficiently good mechanical properties, in engineering practice, it can be improved by chemical stabilisation of the soil. The stabilisation procedure involves adding reagent(s) to the soil with the aim of permanent improvement in the mechanical properties of the soil. In this study, the individual effects of seven different chemical stabilisers (traditional and alternative) on the mechanical properties of clayey soil were analysed. In the first stage of the research, comprehensive analyses were conducted on the effect of each of the selected stabilisers on the compressive strength of the soil. Each of the selected stabilisers was considered with three different content percentages in the soil mixture, with the aim of determining the optimal stabiliser content. Unconfined compressive tests were conducted to determine the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the soil. In the second stage of the research, extensive analyses of the effects of each of the selected stabilisers alone on the improvement in soil shear strength parameters (cohesion and internal friction angle), were carried out with the optimal content of each of the stabilisers. The shear strength parameters were determined by direct shear tests. Both stages of the research were conducted at three different time intervals after the chemical stabilisation (3, 14, and 28 days) in order to determine the long-term efficiency of the chemical treatment of clayey soil. Based on detailed comparative analyses, it was determined that all the selected stabilisers contributed to a lesser or greater extent to a significant improvement in the analysed mechanical properties of clayey soil. A statistical analysis of the obtained results was also conducted using the method of analysis of variance (ANOVA), on the basis of which the individual effect of each selected stabiliser on improving the mechanical properties of clayey soil was validated and quantified.

This paper presents an extensive comparative analysis of the experimental results of chemical stabilisation of clayey soil in laboratory conditions by comparing the effects of adding conventional stabilisers (lime, cement binder), stabilisers that can be considered as waste material (fly ash, rock flour), as well as alternative chloride-based materials (ferric chloride, calcium chloride, potassium chloride) on the geomechanical properties of the soil. With the aim of determining the stabiliser optimal content in the mixture with the soil, in the first part of the research, the effects of stabilisation of clayey soil of medium plasticity using the considered stabilisers with different percentage share on the change in uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and pH value of the soil at different time intervals after the treatment were analysed. In the second part of the research, additional tests were conducted on soil samples with optimal content for each of the considered stabilisers by monitoring changes in the physical and mechanical properties of the soil. These include Atterberg's limits (liquid limit and plasticity limit), modulus of compressibility in the oedometer, California bearing ratio (CBR), and swelling potential at different time intervals after the chemical treatment to determine the durability of stabilisation effects. The results of the conducted research reveal that each of the conventional, waste, and alternative materials considered as chemical stabilisers contributes to the improvement of the geomechanical properties of the clayey soil, primarily in terms of increasing the bearing capacity and reducing the swelling of the treated soil.