This study aimed to address the challenges of solid waste utilization, cost reduction, and carbon reduction in the treatment of deep-dredged soil at Xuwei Port in Lianyungang city of China. Past research in this area was limited. Therefore, a curing agent made from powdered shells was used to solidify the dredged soil in situ. We employed laboratory orthogonal tests to investigate the physical and mechanical properties of the powdered shell-based curing agent. Data was collected by conducting experiments to assess the role of powdered shells in the curing process and to determine the optimal ratios of powdered shells to solidified soil for different purposes. The development of strength in solidified soil was studied in both seawater and pure water conditions. The study revealed that the strength of the solidified soil was influenced by the substitution rate of powdered shells and their interaction with cement. Higher cement content had a positive effect on strength. For high-strength solidified soil, the recommended ratio of wet soil: cement: lime: powdered shells were 100:16:4:4, while for low-strength solidified soil, the recommended ratio was 100:5.4:2.4:0.6. Seawater, under appropriate conditions, improved short-term strength by promoting the formation of expansive ettringite minerals that contributed to cementation and precipitation. These findings suggest that the combination of cement and powdered shells is synergistic, positively affecting the strength of solidified soil. The recommended ratios provide practical guidance for achieving desired strength levels while considering factors such as cost and carbon emissions. The role of seawater in enhancing short-term strength through crystal formation is noteworthy and can be advantageous for certain applications. In conclusion, this research demonstrates the potential of using a powdered shell-based curing agent for solidifying dredged soil in an environmentally friendly and cost-effective manner. The recommended ratios for different strength requirements offer valuable insights for practical applications in the field of soil treatment, contributing to sustainable and efficient solutions for soil management.

This paper investigates the effect of subgrade soil stabilization on the performance and life extension of flexible pavements. Several variables affecting soil stabilization were considered, including subgrade soil type (CL or CH), additive type and content (3, 6, and 9% of hydrated lime, 5, 10, and 15% of class C fly ash (CFA), and 5, 10, and 15% of cement kiln dust (CKD)), three stabilization thicknesses (15, 30, and 45 cm), and four pavement sections with varying thicknesses. The effects of these variables were investigated using four different damage mechanisms, including the fatigue life of the asphalt concrete (AC) and stabilized subgrade layers, the crushing life of the stabilized subgrade soil, and the rutting life of the pavement, using a non-linear mechanistic-empirical methodology. The results suggest that the optimum percentage that maximizes the pavement life occurs at 3% of lime for subgrade soil type CL, 6% of lime for subgrade type CH, and 15% of CFA and CKD for both subgrade soil types. The maximum pavement life increase occurred in the with the lowest thickness and the highest stabilization thickness, which was 1890% for 3% of lime in the CL subgrade and 568% for 6% of lime in the CH subgrade. The maximum increase in the pavement life of subgrade stabilization with 15% of CFA was 2048% in a CL subgrade, and 397% in a CH subgrade, and life extension due to subgrade stabilization with 15% of CKD was 2323% in a CL subgrade and 797% in a CH subgrade.