Undrained residual strength, s(ur), often termed remolded or postcyclic strength, is a critical input into embankment dam numerical deformation analyses. There are multiple methods available to assess s(ur) for fine-grained soils, each with advantages and disadvantages. Field tests, such as the vane shear test and the cone penetration test, can provide reliable in situ measurements of s(ur). In the laboratory, s(ur) can be estimated by measuring the shear stress mobilized at high strains in monotonic tests such as direct simple shear or triaxial shear. s(ur) is also frequently determined from postcyclic monotonic testing; however, the postcyclic stress-strain curves can be difficult to interpret because of high excess pore water pressure existing at the start of monotonic shear due to the sample being previously subjected to cyclic loading. Such analyses often have a significant amount of uncertainty. The work described here presents two new methods developed to quantify s(ur) through lab testing, namely, analysis of stress paths from postcyclic monotonic tests and iterative strain-controlled cyclic loading. This paper introduces the new approaches and presents results from testing performed on five fine-grained soils from the foundations of embankment dams. Values of s(ur) from the new approaches are compared with those from VST and monotonic and postcyclic monotonic direct simple shear testing. The paper details the new approaches and presents results and conclusions from five fine-grained soils from various sites across the western United States.

Land reclamation from the sea is increasingly common in coastal areas in China as its urban population continues to grow and the construction of subways in these areas becomes an effective way to alleviate transportation problems. Earth pressure balance shield (EPBS) tunneling in reclaimed lands often faces the problem of seawater erosion which can significantly affect the effectiveness of soil conditioning. To investigate the impacts, in this work, the stratum adaptability of EPBS foaming agents in seawater environments was evaluated based on a series of laboratory tests. The Atterberg limits and vane shear tests were carried out to understand the evolution characteristics of mechanical properties of clay-rich soils soaked in seawater and then conditioned with foams. The results revealed that, for the same foaming agents, the liquid limit and plastic limit of soils soaked in seawater were lower than those in deionized water due to the thinning of bound water films adsorbed on the surface of soil particles. Similarly, soils soaked in seawater had lower shear strength. In addition, the results indicated that the foam volume (FV) produced by foaming agents using seawater as the solvent was slightly higher than that when using the deionized water due to the higher hydration capacity of inorganic salt cations in seawater compared with organic substances. It was also shown that seawater had negative effects on the half-life time (T1/2) and the dynamic viscosity (eta) of foaming agents due to the neutralization reaction between anions in the foaming agents and Na+ present in seawater. The test results also confirmed that 0.5 % of the tackifier (CMC) can alleviate the issue of thin foam films caused by seawater intrusion and improve the dynamic viscosity of foaming agents more effectively, leading to superior resistance to seawater intrusion in EPBS tunnel constructions.