Prediction of the intensity of earthquake-induced motions at the ground surface attracts extensive attention from the geoscience community due to the significant threat it poses to humans and the built environment. Several factors are involved, including earthquake magnitude, epicentral distance, and local soil conditions. The local site effects, such as resonance amplification, topographic focusing, and basin-edge interactions, can significantly influence the amplitude-frequency content and duration of the incoming seismic waves. They are commonly predicted using site effect proxies or applying more sophisticated analytical and numerical models with advanced constitutive stress-strain relationships. The seismic excitation in numerical simulations consists of a set of input ground motions compatible with the seismo-tectonic settings at the studied location and the probability of exceedance of a specific level of ground shaking over a given period. These motions are applied at the base of the considered soil profiles, and their vertical propagation is simulated using linear and nonlinear approaches in time or frequency domains. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the major input parameters for site response analyses, evaluates the efficiency of site response proxies, and discusses the significance of accurate modeling approaches for predicting bedrock motion amplification. The important dynamic soil parameters include shear-wave velocity, shear modulus reduction, and damping ratio curves, along with the selection and scaling of earthquake ground motions, the evaluation of site effects through site response proxies, and experimental and numerical analysis, all of which are described in this article.

Seismic Site Characterization involves the qualitative assessment of top-soil properties that have the capability of amplifying the generated earthquake ground motions. The geotechnical properties of topsoil refer to the top 30m subsurface profile which plays a vital role in seismic microzonation and Ground Response Analysis (GRA) studies. Among various geotechnical parameters, shear-wave velocity (Vs) of the top 30 m subsurface is mainly linked to seismic site characterization and amplification studies. The average shear-wave velocity of the top 30 m subsurface, Vs(30), has been used for seismic site classification in accordance with the National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) and various building codes. In this study, an attempt has been made to retrieve the geospatial variation of average shear-wave velocity for Coimbatore city using the active Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) test which is one of the non-destructive geophysical tests. To retrieve the spatial distribution of shear-wave velocity (Vs), the test was carried out at 35 locations in the vicinity of important structures, schools, colleges, and hospitals within the city. The seismic records have been acquired in the field and analyzed using the winMASW software. From the one-dimensional MASW test, the study area has an average Vs(30) in the range of 640 m/s to 909 m/s and has been classified as site-class BC (soft rock) according to NEHRP standards. These test results have been validated using the collected SPT bore log data from various locations, including 40 sites in the vicinity of the conducted MASW tests. The site-specific correlation between the shear-wave velocity (Vs) and the corrected SPT N- Value, N1(60), and between Vs and shear modulus (G) have been developed for Coimbatore city with a regression coefficient of 0.79 and 0.83 respectively. From the fundamental site period map, the study area has a site period in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 s, which indicates that 1to 2- storey buildings that are densely distributed throughout the city may lead to damage in case of probable future earthquakes. This study bridges the connectivity from the evaluated bedrock acceleration using the Seismic Hazard Analysis (SHA) and provides insights for evaluating surface acceleration using GRA studies.

Assessing the potential and extent of earthquake-induced liquefaction is paramount for seismic hazard assessment, for the large ground deformations it causes can result in severe damage to infrastructure and pose a threat to human lives, as evidenced by many contemporary and historical case studies in various tectonic settings. In that regard, numerical modeling of case studies, using state-of-the-art soil constitutive models and numerical frameworks, has proven to be a tailored methodology for liquefaction assessment. Indeed, these simulations allow for the dynamic response of liquefiable soils in terms of effective stresses, large strains, and ground displacements to be captured in a consistent manner with experimental and in-situ observations. Additionally, the impact of soil properties spatial variability in liquefaction response can be assessed, because the system response to waves propagating are naturally incorporated within the model. Considering that, we highlight that the effect of shear-wave velocity V s spatial variability has not been thoroughly assessed. In a case study in Metropolitan Concepcion, Chile, our research addresses the influence of V s spatial variability on the dynamic response to liquefaction. At the study site, the 2010 Maule M w 8.8 megathrust Earthquake triggered liquefaction-induced damage in the form of ground cracking, soil ejecta, and building settlements. Using simulated 2D V s profiles generated from real 1D profiles retrieved with ambient noise methods, along with a PressureDependentMultiYield03 sand constitutive model, we studied the effect of V s spatial variability on pore pressure generation, vertical settlements, and shear and volumetric strains by performing effective stress site response analyses. Our findings indicate that increased V s variability reduces the median settlements and strains for soil units that exhibit liquefaction-like responses. On the other hand, no significant changes in the dynamic response are observed in soil units that exhibit non-liquefaction behavior, implying that the triggering of liquefaction is not influenced by spatial variability in V s . We infer that when liquefaction-like behavior is triggered, an increase of the damping at the shallowest part of the soil domain might be the explanation for the decrease in the amplitude of the strains and settlements as the degree of V s variability increases.