This experimental study is to find a solution to reduce the amount of waste and at the same time improve the geotechnical properties of fine soils. Compaction, odometer, direct shear tests, and unconfined compression tests were carried out on a clay with a very high degree of plasticity mixed with 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of recycled concrete aggregates (RCA). The addition of concrete aggregates to the clayey soil shows an increase in the maximum dry density and a reduction in the optimum water content. The odometer tests results showed that the increase in the recycled material content leads to a decrease in the compression index, swelling index and creep index. On the other hand, the pre-consolidation stress, the odometric modulus, the consolidation coefficient and the permeability coefficient increase with increasing RCA content. According to the direct shear test, the higher RCA content provided an improvement in shear strength which is accompanied by an increase in the dilatant character. For different curing times and for a content of 10% recycled concrete aggregate, the unconfined compressive strength increased compared to the untreated soil.

High plasticity clay soils have low bearing and high swelling potential, which can lead to major problems if used in embankment layers. In current study, recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) were used as the most important part of construction and demolition (C&D) wastes in order to reduce the swelling potential and improve the mechanical strenght of high plasticity clay soil, and to achieve these goals, granulated blast furnace slag (GBS) was used as chemical additive. A set of laboratory tests including standard proctor, unconfined compression strength (UCS) and CBR tests were conducted to investigate the mechanical properties of the treated soil. Laboratory observations showed that by adding of RCA wastes to high plasticity clay, the UCS value increased up to 20% RCA content and then decreased with further RCA. Also, adding GBS and prolonged curing time improves the UCS of the clay - RCA mixture, and addition of 9% GBS can be suggested as the optimal content to achieve the design criteria of the subbase and subgrade layers. The use of RCA improves the secant modulus of elasticity (E50) and reduces the deformability index (DI), and these parameters are improved more significantly in the presence of GBS additive.

Interlocking Compressed Earth Blocks (ICEBs) have recently surfaced as a valuable and innovative inclusion among earthen building materials. They offer workable answers to the common problems with burned bricks and cement blocks. Researchers frequently used river sand in their studies to address and reduce the finer content in soil. This study explored recipes to make ICEBs from construction and demolition wastes. Fine recycled concrete aggregate (FRCA) was used as a soil modification within the ICEBs as a part of this investigation to support ecofriendly, low-carbon product development driven by global climate concerns and the need for improved construction waste management to combat pollution. ICEBs, made by mixing construction and demolition trash, regulate environmental impact and address the scarcity of building materials. Due to the inherent diversity of soil and the lack of a standardized mix design for the manufacturing of ICEB, 40 different mix ratios were generated using the proportionated blends of sand and FRCA. Based on the compressive strength results, the best recipes representing conventional river sand and the FRCA were selected. The prepared samples of ICEBs using the optimized mix recipes of river sand and FRCA were further analyzed for mechanical, thermal, and durability performance alongside the required forensic endorsements, and the test results were enhanced for both ICEBs compared to first-class burnt clay bricks. Sand-incorporated ICEBs achieved 13.72 MPa compressive strength, while FRCA-incorporated ICEBs reached 13.38 MPa. Both ICEBs showed a noticeable improvement in compressive strength compared to various studies. The durability of ICEBs, in terms of water absorption, improved around 70% compared to fired bricks commonly used in the construction industry. The test findings reveal that FRCA incorporated ICEBs showed 14.3% lower thermal conductivity than ICEBs with sand incorporation. Therefore, the use of ICEBs specially designed with FRCA provides the most sustainable alternative to conventional fired bricks used by the construction sector in the developing countries.