This paper examines the effects of near-field pulse-like earthquake ground motions (GMs) on the seismic resilience, repair cost and time, and structural collapse risk of low-to-high-rise selected multi-story RC structures with special moment-resisting frames (SMRFs) and shear walls. Selected 5-, 10-, and 15-story structures are designed based on a seismically active region where pulse-like GMs are more likely to occur. Two different sets of near-field GMs are chosen based on the recommendations of FEMA P-695 to conduct nonlinear dynamic analyses. Subsequently, the methodology provided in FEMA P-58 is adopted to perform a comprehensive seismic performance assessment at various hazard levels. It is shown that the consideration of the effects of near-field pulse-like GMs can considerably increase the risk of structural collapse in RC shear wall systems, based on the ratio of the pulse period of ground motion records to the elastic first mode period, in comparison to the near-field GMs without a pulse. It is concluded that the stated ratio is a crucial parameter to assess the risk to the life safety (LS) of low-to-high-rise RC buildings. For frequently occurring seismic intensities, repairable damage to nonstructural elements is the main factor contributing to the total expected economic loss in the studied buildings, irrespective of the selected GM set and the number of stories. In addition, the contribution of collapse and demolition due to residual drift in the estimation of repair time is significant for pulse-like GMs.

This study investigates the seismic response of two 20-story adjacent reinforced concrete structures with differing lateral load-bearing systems, emphasizing the influence of soil-structure interaction. In total, 72 numerical models explored the combined effects of 9 earthquake motions, 4 soil types, and 2 structural designs. Analytical fragility curves revealed superior seismic resilience for the structure with shear walls compared to the bare frame structure. Shear walls increased the capacity to withstand earthquakes by up to 56% for each damage level. Soil behavior analysis investigated the effect of soil properties. Softer soil exhibited larger deformations and settlements compared to stiffer soil, highlighting soil ductility's role in the system's response. The study further assessed potential pounding between structures. The connection between structural stiffness and soil deformability significantly affected pounding risk. The provided gap (350 mm) proved insufficient to prevent pounding under various earthquake scenarios and soil types, leading to damage to RC components. These findings emphasize the crucial need to consider both structural systems and soil properties in seismic assessments.