Steel and reinforced concrete buildings are popular structural systems. The design of these buildings is regulated by deterministic building codes. In this context, it is established that if building codes are followed, the structure will resist demands without collapsing. However, no regulation is required to control the damage of structures in terms of performance criteria. In this paper, the seismic performance and structural reliability of both steel and reinforced concrete buildings, respectively, are analyzed as a benchmark case of study. Both buildings are designed in an earthquake-prone area for two soil types, respectively. Subsequently, nonlinear dynamic analyzes are conducted and the seismic responses of the models are determined in terms of inter-story drift. To obtain seismic responses, eleven characteristic ground motions of the region are selected corresponding to three performance levels: (1) immediate occupancy, (2) life safety, and (3) collapse prevention, respectively. It was documented that the resulting maximum inter-story drift was much lower than the one obtained from modal analysis. In addition, the risk was computed in terms of reliability index integrating a novel probabilistic approach with performance-based design criteria. According to the results, a small variation in the structural risk among the buildings under consideration is observed. However, buildings designed for rigid soil proved to be more reliable. Additionally, it is observed that the buildings designed with current regulations are too conservative based on the performance criteria limits. Hence, structures located on earthquake-prone areas may be overdesigned when implementing deterministic building codes.

Pile-Supported Wharves (PSW) are critical for maritime operations but are highly vulnerable to seismic events, which can disrupt port activities. Previous seismic events have highlighted that short free length piles in wharf structures are particularly prone to earthquake damage. This paper aims to mitigate damage between the wharf deck and piles connections by adopting the seismic isolation systems. Conventional Wharf (CW) and Isolated Wharf (IW) structures were comprehensively assessed, focusing on Pile-Soil Interaction (PSI), using the finite element software OpenSees for advanced numerical simulations. Non-Linear Time History Analysis (NLTHA) of CW and IW has been conducted to verify the design under Contingency Level Earthquake (CLE) and Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) scenarios. The analysis aims to enhance the performance of short free length piles within the IW structure. Comparative analysis of fragility curves between CW and IW structures shows that isolation systems significantly reduce seismic fragility by 49%, 60%, and 67% at the MCE level for minimal damage, control & repairable damage and life safety protection across three performance levels, respectively. These findings indicate that the implementation of isolation measures has significantly enhanced the seismic performance and safety of PSW structures.