Soft clays exhibit significant challenges in geotechnical engineering due to their low permeability, high compressibility, and susceptibility to settlement under applied loads. These geological factors pose unique difficulties in predicting long-term settlement accurately and efficiently, particularly through Class C prediction methods that involve iterative processes with complex numerical models. To address these challenges, this study presents an efficient approach for Class C prediction of long-term settlement in soft clays. This approach integrates Bayesian updating with structural reliability methods (BUS) and the general simplified Hypothesis B method which is a semi-analytical method based on one-dimensional elastic visco-plastic (1D EVP) model. Unlike previous research that used Response Surface Model (RSM) with polynomial function for consolidation evaluation, the proposed approach enhances both accuracy and performance consistency under varying conditions. Additionally, by leveraging analytical solutions instead of iterative small-time steps required by Finite Element Method (FEM) or Finite Difference Method (FDM), the computational efficiency is also enhanced. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated through its application to an embankment improved with prefabricated vertical drain (PVD) in Ballina, New South Wales, Australia. Comparative analyses demonstrate that the predicted settlements from this study, using only the monitoring settlement data collected prior to the 76th day of the project, align closely with the results from established RSM and FEM-based Bayesian back analysis approaches. The obtained results also indicate that the predicted settlements, based on 76 days of monitoring data, closely match field measurements at various depths, whether relying solely on settlement data or integrating additional pore water pressure data. For the Ballina embankment, over 40,000 consolidation analyses required for a single BUS simulation can be completed within 10 h using the general simplified Hypothesis B method, compared to months it might take with FEM or FDM approaches. This makes the proposed approach a practical tool for geotechnical engineers, enabling reliable settlement predictions early in the project timeline while maintaining low computational costs.

In uncoupled consolidation analysis, settlement and pore water pressure are solved independently, whereas in coupled analysis, they are solved simultaneously to ensure continuity (i.e., the volume change in soil due to compression must equal the water volume change caused by dissipation). This study investigates the coupling effects of soil deformation and pore water pressure dissipation in the back analysis of soft soil settlements. It further evaluates the suitability of both coupled and uncoupled constitutive models with different types of monitoring data, providing practical guidance for selecting consolidation models and achieving reliable long-term predictions. The one-dimensional governing equations for soft soil consolidation, incorporating prefabricated vertical drains and creep deformation, are first reviewed. A case study of a trial embankment in Ballina, New South Wales, Australia, is then used to demonstrate the impact of coupling effects and monitoring data on settlement predictions. The results show that considering coupling effects not only improves long-term settlement predictions but also reduces uncertainties in the updated soil parameters, especially when both settlement and pore water pressure data are used.