Offshore wind turbines, crucial for global electricity generation, face significant challenges from harsh marine conditions, including strong wind, waves, and uneven seabeds. To optimize the foundation solution, this study investigates the lateral performance of helical monopiles, comparing conventional monopiles under cyclic loading, with a focus on variations in pile configuration and soil conditions. Model-scale experiments were conducted with helical piles subjected to both monotonic and one-way cyclic loading conditions. Key variations in the study include three soil densities (Dr = 35 %, 55 %, and 75 %), along with different slope conditions (Flat, 1V:5H, 1V:3H, 1V:2H) and pile positions (c = 0Dp, 2.5Dp, 5Dp, 7.5Dp). Additionally, the effect of load amplitudes (xi b = 50 %, 40 %, and 30 %) applied at a frequency of 0.25Hz for over 1000 cycles was examined. Results showed that helical piles outperformed conventional monopiles, exhibiting up to 25 % higher lateral load capacity, 30 % less accumulated rotation, and 20 % greater cyclic stiffness, especially in dense soils. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that the performance of helical piles significantly improved when placed nearer to the slope crest and in denser soils. Numerical simulations using PLAXIS 3D confirmed these experimental findings, demonstrating that helical piles consistently maintain superior lateral resistance and cyclic performance under varying loading conditions and slope configurations. This study underscores the potential of helical piles to enhance the stability ad performance of offshore wind turbine foundations, offering a more robust and efficient alternative to monopile systems.