Structures constructed on collapsible soil are prone to failure under flooding. Agro-waste like rice husk ash (RHA) and its geopolymer (LGR), consisting of lime (L), RHA, water glass (Na2SiO3), and caustic soda (NaOH), present a potential solution to address this issue. RHA and LGR were mixed up to 16% to improve the collapsible soil. Samples were remolded at optimal water content and maximum dry density for strength and collapsible potential tests. Unconfined compressive strength, deformation modulus, and soaked California bearing ratio exhibit exponential improvement with the inclusion of LGR. Additionally, for comparison of microstructural characteristics, analyses involving energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were conducted on both virgin and treated specimens. LGR resulted in the emergence of new peaks of sodium silicates and calcium silicates, as indicated by EDAX. The formation of H-C-A-S gel and H-N-A-S gel observed in SEM suggests the development of bonds among soil particles attributed to geopolymerization. SEM reveals the transformation of the inherent collapsible soil from a dispersed and silt-dominated structure to a reticulated structure devoid of micro-pores following the incorporation of LGR. A numerical model was constructed to forecast the performance of both virgin and stabilized collapsible soils under pre- and post-flooding conditions. The outcomes indicate an enhancement in the soil's bearing capacity upon stabilization with 12% LGR. The implementation of 12% LGR significantly resulted in a lower embodied energy-tostrength ratio, emissions-to-strength ratio, and relatively lower cost-to-strength ratio compared to the soil treated with 16% cement kiln dust (CKD). (c) 2025 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/

The paper reviews the published literature on some aspects of fabric and particle behaviour in cohesionless soils. It uses insights from Discrete Element Modelling and Microcomputed Tomography to speculate on reasons for the difference in behaviour observed between moist tamped and sedimented sands at the same global void ratio and stress state. It is suggested that inhomogeneities in the form of macrovoids in moist tamped samples trigger localisation, collapse and the development of a local scale chain reaction. It questions whether a similar sequence applies at the field scale and whether expansive partial drainage influences the rate of propagation of the chain reaction. The paper offers reasons why the use of critical state based on moist tamped samples to assess the stability of tailings, may not be the best approach, and suggests that identifying instability lines for sedimented samples at appropriate void ratios and principal stress directions, may be preferable. Critical state reflects behaviour at large strains where initial and evolving inhomogeneities affect identification of relevant void ratios; instability lines reflect behaviour at small strains where inhomogeneities probably initiate collapse. The paper emphasises the importance of spatial variations in local void ratios in loose material, the importance of anisotropy of collapse potential and of load-controlled rather that strain-controlled shearing.

Collapsible soils are located in various parts of the world. These soils are characterized by their low values of dry unit weight and natural water content. Collapse and large induced settlements at the saturation state damage the structures built on them. Therefore, measuring the collapse potential of these soils is essential for safe engineering works. This study aims to investigate the collapse index and collapse potential of clayey soil stabilized with calcium carbide residue (CCR). For this purpose, seven different contents of CCR, five curing periods, three different water contents, and two relative compactions were used. The results of tests showed that the CCR contents, relative compaction, and water content during sample preparation were the most key factors in collapsibility measurements. It was observed that CCR contents greatly reduced collapse index and collapse potential of soil and changed the degree of collapse from moderately severe to slight and non-collapsible one. Furthermore, increasing the relative compaction reduces the pore space between the soil particles, leading the denser structure. The denser the soil, the lower the initial void ratios, hence, there is less collapse upon wetting. Finally, the stabilized samples prepared with 2% less than optimum water content have a higher degree of collapse than those with optimum water content and 2% more than optimum water content. The results of this study corroborate the effectiveness of CCR as a by-product material to improve collapsible soils.