Plant species can have ecological impacts on co-occurring species by altering their resistance to natural enemies. Associational resistance occurs when one species reduces enemy damage to neighboring species, whereas associational susceptibility increases enemy damage to neighboring species. In a previous study, Ipomoea tricolor 'Pearly Gates' plants, endosymbiotic with alkaloid-producing Periglandula fungi developed fewer nematode galls and produced less biomass than non-endosymbiotic plants. To explore whether endosymbiont-mediated resistance could extend to neighboring species, we grew endosymbiotic or non-endosymbiotic I. tricolor with corn (Zea mays) in soil inoculated with Southern root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) or no inoculation controls. Both nematode and endosymbiont treatments reduced total plant biomass per pot, but corn produced significantly more biomass in the nematode addition treatment when morning glory was endosymbiotic, consistent with associational resistance. These results suggest that the Periglandula endosymbiont of I. tricolor can enhance the growth of co-occurring plants in the presence of natural enemies.

Ensuring food security through sustainable systems remains a key goal for the agricultural sector. However, poor crop management practices in recent decades have caused significant ecological harm, evidenced by climate change impacts, soil degradation, and water scarcity. Biotic and abiotic stresses during crop development further reduce yield and quality. Reviving traditional farming practices, such as the milpa system, offers a solution to boost production sustainably while repairing past damage. This comprehensive polyculture system centers on maize, intercropped with beans, squash, chili, fava beans, and other crops. Ecologically, milpas enhance biodiversity, improve soil physicochemical properties, and mitigate environmental harm through beneficial interactions among plants, insects, and microorganisms. This work examines these interactions, with a focus on the role of beneficial microorganisms in reversing environmental damage and revitalizing milpa systems. Adopting these tools can strengthen traditional practices, promoting sustainability and ensuring food security.

In production of cereals like maize ( Zea mays L.) and barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), seeds are often treated with pesticides and/or commercial products of plant beneficial microorganisms (PBM) to reduce possible root damage from insect pests and soil borne root diseases. In a field experiment with maize and barley under conservation agriculture, we examined how such seed treatments affected the resident root and soil microbiota. The seed treatments included a pesticide mixture and different commercial products of common PBM based on the biocontrol agents (BCA) Trichoderma harzianum and Metarhizium anisopliae alone and in combination and a mix of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), which were compared to a negative control without seed treatment. Soil and root samples were taken at two and three sampling times during the crop cycles for barley and maize, respectively, to measure root biomass, root colonization with mycorrhizal fungi and pathogens, soil microbial communities at a general taxonomic level using biomarker fatty acids, and ecological guilds of soil nematodes. Root health was monitored with observations of the presence of insect feeding larvae and root disease symptoms, which in general showed healthy roots during the full crop cycle. Overall, most of the root and soil biota variables measured changed during the crop cycle. However, for both crops, the seed treatments had no effects on the soil and root microbiota measured, except in the case of barley root infection with Polymyxa sp., which was reduced by all treatments. In conclusion, the pesticide and PBM seed treatments evaluated in the present study for maize and barley under conservation agriculture, in general, had limited effects on the resident root and soil microbiota. However, future studies should include complementary high-resolution sequencing methods when examining non-target effects of pesticides and microbial inoculants on the root and soil microbiota.

As sea levels continue to rise and high tide flooding events increase in frequency, researchers and farmers alike are looking for solutions to adapt to and mitigate the effects of saltwater intrusion (SWI). Some landowners on the Lower Eastern Shore of Maryland respond to SWI by taking land out of agriculture. For example, they (1) attempt to remediate salt-damaged soils (e.g., planting switchgrass, Panicum virgatum), (2) restore native marsh grasses (e.g., planting saltmarsh hay, Spartina patens), or (3) abandon fields altogether (e.g., allow for natural recruitment). This work examines the ability of each of these land management practices to reduce phosphorus (P) levels in soils and porewater, with the overall goal to benefit both the farming community and water quality in the Chesapeake Bay. We show that remediation and restoration practices are efficient at taking up soil P and reducing porewater P concentrations through biomass P uptake. After three years of growth, we observed an increase in P uptake in biomass of Panicum virgatum (remediation species; 11-30 kg ha-1) and Spartina patens (restoration species; 4-18 kg ha-1) and a decline in available soil P pools (M3P; 30-50 % kg M3P ha-1). At all farms, under all three management strategies, the P fertility index value (FIV) in the topsoil was 33-50 % lower than baseline conditions, likely reducing the potential release of P to nearby waterways. Results from this work will help inform state-level coastal management policies and determine optimal strategies for climate resilience.

Agriculture occupies more than a third of the world's land with many, large-scale impacts on the environment and human health. This article investigates the failure of policy to manage these impacts, asks whether private law can fill the gap, and what this means for policymakers. The investigation takes the form of a case study of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer (SNF) in English policy and law. The SNF industry has been chosen because, by its own account, it underpins the modern food system, which is recognized as needing urgent transformation. The article first assesses the damage caused by SNF to health and the environment and the potential legal remedies. It then assesses industry claims that SNF (a) provides food security, (b) is beneficial to soil and water, and (c) reduces greenhouse gas emissions. If misleading, these representations could amount to unlawful 'greenwashing'. While private law can never replace good policy and regulation, the article concludes that there is evidence to enable private law to supplement policy, and that this role is made possible as well as necessary by the absence of effective regulation and enforcement. Private litigation could catalyze policymakers to implement the robust regulatory regime that agriculture demands. As the law must focus on scientific evidence and causation, it can also help elucidate and publicize the science on which policy is based. Finally, because of the strict constraints within which private litigation must operate, it can direct policymakers towards strategic interventions (or tipping points) that could catalyze systemic change.

Urban and peri-urban lands can be an important source of food production for localised and sustainable food systems, however, their soils can be of poor quality, degraded or damaged by anthropic activities, and little is known about their suitability or safety. This paper aims to contribute to this knowledge gap by assessing the soil remediation capacity and qualities of different types of compost made from urban and peri-urban organic wastes for agroecological food production. Prepared over the course of 2021, and used in 2022 for food growing, five different composts were observed and analysed, in two different farms in the city of Rosario, Argentina. Four raw materials generated largely by local industries were used to make the composts: chicken manure, rumen (cow's stomachs), brewer's bagasse (byproducts of the beer industry) and urban leaves collected from the municipality waste collection. These were mixed in different proportions (all reaching the 20-30 C/N ratio, typical of quality compost) to produce viable growing substrates where radishes and lettuces were grown. The aim of the study was to assess the possibility, quality and limitations to use locally available organic inputs for soil fertility management in agroecological farming, in the context of urbanisation and to assess pathways to develop closed-cycle agroecological agriculture at metropolitan level. Natural manure substrates (raw and composted) were analysed, as well as crops grown and fertilised with each of the substrates. The attributes and limiting factors of each substrate and their response to local soil conditions were compared and physicochemical, biochemical, and microbiological analyses were performed, including among others, the study of microbial biomass, biological activity, biophytotoxicity, pH, aerobic heterotrophs, nitrogen fixation, and the presence of antibiotics, agrochemicals and heavy metals. The results of the analyses show that all the composted materials improved the physical, chemical and biological properties. However, in some cases, pollutants were present even after composting. Analysis carried out on the vegetables generally indicate undetectable levels or levels below the admissible limits, demonstrating the filtering capacity of the different composts and the soil.

Millet/cowpea intercropping is a promoted practice in Sub-Saharan agriculture. However, because cowpea is known as a host for plant-parasitic nematodes that may also infect millet, we examined whether intercropping may increase the risk of nematode-mediated millet damage, and if this risk may be controlled by organic amendments. In twelve Senegalese farmers' fields which had been either non-manured or regularly manured over the past 10 years at least, we assessed the effects of intercropping millet and cowpea on the abundance of free-living and plant-parasitic nematodes, ecological indices, and land equivalent ratios (LER). Six fields were manured, and six non-manured. Each field included four plots: millet and cowpea as pure stands, and two plots with millet intercropped with cowpea sown at two densities. Soil nematofauna was evaluated before sowing and at cowpea flowering. Soil nematofauna was dominated by plant-parasitic nematodes. Before manure application and crop sowing, regularly manured fields had higher structure indices of nematofauna than non-manured ones, and Pratylenchus was almost absent. At crop flowering, abundance of Pratylenchus increased and was drastically higher in pure cowpea (149 individuals 100 g(-1) dry soil) than in intercropping and pure millet (18 and 17 individuals 100 g(-1) dry soil, respectively), regardless of the manuring regime. Manuring had significant positive effects on various bacterivorous families, on fungivorous and plant-parasitic trophic groups, but not on Pratylenchus. Millet and cowpea yields of manured fields were the highest, regardless of cropping pattern. LER averaged 1.7 and 1.5 in manured and non-manured intercropping, respectively. Regardless of the treatments, ecological indices indicated that the soil food web was undisturbed, with moderate enrichment, and suppressive against crop pests. Intercropping millet with cowpea, even in poorly manured fields and with high cowpea density, constitutes an appropriate way to improve productivity without increasing Pratylenchus pressure in nutrient-poor soils of central Senegal.