(3)

The paper proposes a discussion about origin and evolution of proglacial, paraglacial and periglacial concepts. It aims to show differentiation of landforms, process, questions and also the critiques that are unique of each other. Over the years the three terms have been made redundant and employed in an overlapping manner, even that they are quite different concepts and are defined in quite different ways. Furthermore, in spite of the growing participation of Brazilian researchers in Antarctica the epistemological issues about these environments still remains as a gap in national publications. The proglacial landscape is pioneer in receiving the glaciated products and it is a primarily depositional environment. Such environments are totally adjusted to the regime of fluvial, marine and lacustrine processes that occur immediately adjacent to the glacier and consequently the proglacial domain follows the movement of the ice margin. The paraglacial landscape it is not defined by location or processes, but by trajectory from glacial to non-glacial environment. Thus, the diagnostic criteria is time, and the paraglacial environment is in recovering from the disturbance of glaciation. The periglacial realm is defined primarily by freeze-thaw cycles and deep seasonal freezing. The presence of permafrost is not required.

来源平台：REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GEOMORFOLOGIA